Dharmachakra Rainbow Wheel.svg

Lotus Jewel Sahasrara.svg  
I will cherish these few specks of time.
~ Everything Everywhere All at Once ~
  Lotus Jewel Sahasrara.svg

Guy Dharmachakra.svg

Well is ALL.
Well All IS.

Compass Card transparent.png
Kalki · archives: X · index · iota · imago · αnima · 2003 · 2004 · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · controversies · assessments‎‎ · VOC·K · 2009 † 2010 · outrages · 2011 · contentions · RfA1 · 2012 · RfA2‎‎ · 2013 · 2014 · RfA3‎‎ · 2015 · RfA4 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · Magic · Worldsong · Restorations · Chronology · Vox Box · Heroes · OZ · OASIS ·
JUL Iris Soul Palm.png
Uffington White Horse layout.png
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.
~ Albert Einstein ~
Clover symbol.svg
Dearinth Goddess.png
Answer to Life.png
Terry Pratchett Arms.svg
Circle-A red.svg
Noia 64 apps karm.png This user has been on Wikiquote for
18 years, 10 months, and 15 days.




Blue Pacific.svg
Caput mortuum.svg

With this and other accounts I have made over 157,000 contributive edits, created well over 17000 pages and done substantial work on well over 1000 more, some of which are listed here. JUL Soul Iris.png
Etruscan Horse 2.jpg


I usually have only a sporadic presence here on most days.

I remain very busy with many urgent and diverse tasks and expect to very often be doing very minimal editing here for most of the days of most of the coming years.
Though I once regularly spent many hours of most days at least monitoring this site, I now quite often spend less than an hour a day doing so, at various random periods within any day. There are sometimes stretches of weeks where I am hardly online at all, most days. There may be a few periods in some years where I will have the opportunity for extensive activities here for days at a time, but I am not actually counting on that occurring very often. I shall continue to usually check in at least daily, most of the time, but Time shall reveal what opportunities times can provide.
So it goes Blessings. ~ ♞♌︎Kalki·⚓︎
ALL abides, always, and all abide, ALWAYS amidst ALL.

Carl Schurz quote on Karl MarxEdit

You have recently reverted my edits to Karl Marx. I shortened the Carl Schurz quote on Karl Marx as I have other quotes. The page is not well maintained. Please consider contributing. I don't appreciate being accused of censorship. Please, follow WQ:FAITH. --Ashawley (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

And you've done it again with this edit comment:

I have not yet checked the "shortening" you have done on other entries — but the "shortening" you have done on this quote is DEFINITELY censorship — and quite apparently biased censorship — whatever you choose to call it.

Please refrain from accusations. I'm shortening the quote for length not content. That he held contempt for his enemies is well known. Preserving the criticisms of Schurz seems sufficient for an obscure quote that is only listed in Google search results 8 times[1] --Ashawley (talk) 01:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Sock discussionEdit

Hi Kalki I happened to see that a sock of yours created Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army. As you are probably aware the topic of socks is being discussed at Wikiquote:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Babe_kebab for quite some time now. I wonder why you have not participated in that discusion, since you don't seem to be shy about posting publicly about controversial issues? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: Me too, I'd like to see the comments from Kalki and other admins about the lock and possible hounding of one of the most constructive editors of wikiquote. DanielTom has said that the only way he could get unlocked would be with help of others, and if admins who have seen that this is a very constructive editor who may have been unfairly locked, and a proposal or request could be made with support by admins, then it is more likely he will get unlocked. Because I have been busy I have not commented much but I will try to add some observations on this in the coming days or weeks.
This is DanielToms comments:
From what I have seen, and experienced first-hand years ago, stewards globally lock accounts with little or no critical thinking, simply following requests (sometimes raised by overzealous admins or other users with personal vendettas). Global locks are very difficult to appeal, at least without the help of other users. The users that are globally locked are not so much as notified, thus they cannot defend themselves prior to the global lock. Needless to say, this is a great injustice. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
-- ~ #SheSaid 13:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Why do you feel I am a "malicious troll" (swastikas)?Edit

During dicussion at the Village pump: Why are there so many pages with images containing a swastika on WQ?

you said this to me On 18:42, 6 March 2021:

I have long suspected you to be, and increasingly perceive evidence of you very likely being very little more than a malicious troll around here, despite various forms of camouflage and acceptable edits.

I must say I was surprised when no one reacted to this egregious personal attack against me, and I started wondering if the comments that have been made about me, by people who do not normally participate in discussion at WQ but who have also accused me of being a troll, have merit? I am particularly interested to know if the other admins at WQ also feel that I am simply a malicious troll and that this is my sole motivation for my edits at WQ. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

You seem deeply offended by perceived personal attacks: have you never read any of Daniel Tom's edit summaries regarding me calling me incompetent on dozens of occasions within their edit summaries? DanielTom has also called me a troll, as I'm sure you can see for yourself by going through their edit history for about an hour and using control F. You quote DanielTom in the Sock discussion section of this page, care to comment on their behavior and how it differs, or doesn't,from the way you are allegedly being treated? I'm not surprised by the lack of a response, calling someone a troll is not one of the five and six letter words that gets you an instant ban on a website or risks disciplinary action in the world at large, unlike, say, calling someone another five letter mythical creature, fairy, which many organizations' lawyers would consider to legally constitute a hate crime.
Also for the record I still find your edits to be generally lacking, although calling you mean names isn't going to change that. I find your insistence that you can't edit the page for Roe v. Wade yet can still continue to edit all the other pages without any problems rather bizarre as well. CensoredScribe (talk) 23:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

u chose war, war it shall be/enjoy as much as i do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1Edit

u call me vandal (but you are the real vandal with super vandal antandrus who is also pretending to be somebody's mother and spoofing emails in her name) when i try to bring proper quote for wislawa, now im fighitng back on other site where u have no power, one good turn deserves another, stop it, or all your work will be gone: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Montaigne_-_c.1590_portrait.png —This unsigned comment is by (talkcontribs) 19:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC).

To anyone interested — this asinine threat is an act of a long term abuser who has been vandalizing and trolling WMF sites since 2005, and seems to have returned to greater activity here lately. So it goes... ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 19:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Further info on this user, for those puzzled by his incoherent ravings:
Long term abuser "Projects" is a "Globally banned user: Foundation Global Ban- do not reinstate. Questions can be directed to trustandsafety@wikimedia.org."
He is banned by the Wikimedia Foundation and may not edit any Wikimedia project. All accounts/IPs should be globally locked/blocked on sight.
Responding to this editor or even just blocking him may open you up to long-term harassment and direct threats. If you feel unsafe, you may contact the Chicago police for help.
I know that I myself have witnessed but a very small portion of the copious amounts of harassment, trolling, direct or indirect vandal-spam to external sites, and contemptible threats which he has directed at MANY individuals on various sites over many years, and can assert I truly find him to be a pitiably and pathetically deluded human being. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 12:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC) + tweak
For many years he has regularly posted "diffs" to various postings of his ravings on Wikimedia wikis, and often now also posts links to various external sites where he has posted rants and ravings about "THE ETERNAL TRUTH ON WIKI-PEDO-IA, WIKISCUM, WIKIHYPOCRITES, WIKILOWLIFES, WIKINOBODIES, ETC!!!" So it goes... ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 13:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocking FunhausFrank's tr011 and Geraldo Perez 2.0.5Edit

Hi, can you take action against the users FunhausFrank's tr011 and Geraldo Perez 2.0.5. They have been reportedly engaging in vandalistic behaviour towards my talk page and Korean Air Lines Flight 007. I tried to revert FunhausFrank's tr011's vandalistic edits, but he has not stopping and reverting my edits. Geraldo Perez 2.0.5, who is falsely masquerading as a Wikiquote administartor, is adding message to my talk page saying that I have been blocked with racist messages added on the reasons for being blocked, which is clearly an evidence of rogue user engaging in behaviour of vandalism. From their behaviour, these three users seems to be spam users or bots.

Hope you can take action against these users ASAP. Toadboy123 (talk) 16:41, 01 September 2021 (PST)

These accounts have now been permanently blocked. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 23:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much ! Toadboy123 (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2021 (PST)

quote of the day Baruch SpinozaEdit

Hi Kalki

Just to let you know: I try to find the time to look up the WQ quote of the day. When I did this today I discovered I could not look at the souce of the quote.

Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The current link in the Spinoza article to Tractatus Politicus as translated by A. H. Gosset (1883) does appear to be dead at this point; I don’t presently have time to seek another one, as I must be leaving soon — but will seek one after I return. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 22:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Sun TzuEdit

From Wikipedia: “The Art of War (Chinese: 孫子兵法) is an ancient Chinese military treatise dating from the Late Spring and Autumn Period (roughly 5th century BC). The work, which is attributed to the ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu ("Master Sun", also spelled Sunzi), is composed of 13 chapters. Each one is devoted to a different set of skills (or "art") related to warfare and how it applies to military strategy and tactics. For almost 1,500 years it was the lead text in an anthology that was formalized as the Seven Military Classics by Emperor Shenzong of Song in 1080. The Art of War remains the most influential strategy text in East Asian warfare[1] and has influenced both Far Eastern and Western military thinking, business tactics, legal strategy, lifestyles and beyond.” (Again: Sun Tzu: Wikipedia)

Me: Regardless who “The Art of War” is ULTIMATELY attributed to, or NOT…The saying: “Keep your friends close; keep your enemies closer.” is arguably contained in that body of work. That is simple history. Attributing this phrase to a movie from the 70’s is LAUGHABLE, as is your reasoning that anything discovered by research in this millennium CANNOT by definition trump “research” from the 70’s, come on! (So sorry to put it as directly as that…”extensibly researched.”) ADMINISTRATIVE (¿how are you even allowed?) retrogress, such as YOU have demonstrated, is the VERY reason people CANNOT quote Wikipedia without derision thrown back at them! Change it back…or lose a donor. Additionally, I promise I will NEVER use your site, defend it to others, and will even JOIN the naysayers (and tell them why—how you DON’T even use Wikipedia’s own data to publish accurate articles). JaneDoeSelvidge (talk) 07:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

It is relatively simple to seek historical records on the internet, and to this day, though the phrase is now OFTEN over-confidentally attributed to "Sun Tzu" and the Art of War, or sometimes Machiavelli or Petrarch — there remains NO publication yet located where the phrase or even phrases to precisely that point occur prior to it's use in the 1974 film Godfather II. That is the fact which prompted the declaration of the attribution to Sun Tzu's Art of War a highly popular ERROR, and that remains a fact which makes that a valid assertion. It might be very easy to say that it is "arguably contained in that body of work" — but it is much more difficult to genuinely FIND any instance of the phrase in ANY actual translation of the work prior to 1974, or so far as I know, even in any genuine translation since. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 19:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


I've sent you an email. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered usersEdit


You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quote of the Day for March 4Edit

Just an FYI: I added a new suggestion for the March 4 Quote of the Day by Buzz Aldrin. I think it would work well paired with today's Quote of the Day for March 3 in light of global events. Nicole Sharp (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion. I considered it, but for several days had been intending to quote some of the comments of UN ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield and a few other international diplomats on recent events. I have started a page for her today, and hope to have time to add a bit more to it in coming days. I would recommend placing your suggestion on the January 20 QOTD suggestion page, where I would probably rank it a 3, with a strong lean toward 4. I will keep it in mind, as events proceed, but am likely to generally use quotes more specific to to the present crises caused by Putin's decision to initiate the Russian invasion of Ukraine, for many of the coming days. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 00:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Block requestEdit

Please block them. Thank you. --Victor Trevor (talk) 15:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Encyclopedia DramaticaEdit


Can you please delete my page on Encyclopedic Dramatic, it's not real. – Ilovemydoodle (talk | e-mail) 00:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I am not actually sure what you are requesting — I am not an active member of that non-WMF project, wherever some online version of it might exist, and the article page which exists regarding it here "Encyclopedia Dramatica", though it has little merit or activity related to it, there is not actually much to delete, or in urgent need of deletion. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 00:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
GRP made page saying stuff against me and then locked it. – Ilovemydoodle (talk | e-mail) 00:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The constant crap that GRP regularly indulges in and promotes is ultimately of little real consequence, and wherever it exists, few people take actual note of it. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 00:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Russia being larger than PlutoEdit

While I respect your point of view, it is already written that Russia encompasses 1/8 of Earth's inhabited surface. Why not add more to it, to make the reader grasp the massiveness. You probably feel what I mean. --Spafky (talk) 07:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Am I a bad editor?Edit

I hope this isn't too blunt a question to ask, and you don't have to answer; but you said I made some good edits a few years ago: is that still true? CensoredScribe (talk) 03:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I believe that I probably commented to the effect that though many of your edits have often added overly extensive tracts on abstruse matters, which are often hard to look upon favorably, some of your edits have been worthy additions. I actually am far less involved in reviewing most edits of anyone here than I once was, and usually have only dealt with QOTD work and whatever obvious vandalism I encounter in my generally brief checks in on the site. For quite some time I have not been online very much of the day, though that might change a bit at times in the coming year or so. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 00:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I believe now, as before, that is a fair assessment. Some of my edits recently have been excessively detailed: when discussing decades of time and millions of people, it would really be much easier just to view that information as a graph than describing those changes verbally, although I've been working on a topic that is notorious for how obsessive people are concerning it. I am having great difficulty determining what it is with this subject that people actually consider to be worth repeating, outside of sound bites from politicians, lengthy diatribes from religious authorities and equally lengthy legal decisions. Normally I find scientists very concise in summarizing their findings in the introduction and conclusion sections of scientific papers, in a way that is presentable to the general public; but in this particular area it's not so much about proving or disproving a hypothesis than it is about providing numerous observations through raw data, and that tends to be as monumental as it is neutral. CensoredScribe (talk) 23:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

New oneEdit

What if 2020 was a person? Any actions? — 04:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


Dear Kalki I need your help. 2600:387:C:7133:0:0:0:3 01:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
On English Wikipedia can you restore the 2010s content and the 2020s content for the history section of
the article horror? 2600:387:C:7133:0:0:0:3 01:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Horror filmEdit

I mean come on a 2010s to present content on the history section of the horror film article and a 2010s-present section on the history of
horror films article that doesn't make on both articles somebody's got to fix them both. 2600:387:C:7133:0:0:0:3 02:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

May 1Edit

Could you rate my suggestion to May 1? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Share your feedback in the Administratior accountability pollEdit

  The Administratior accountability poll is open, vote here. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 00:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Village PumpEdit

Could you please go vote on the latest question on the Village Pump? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 21:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


The Template I added to the user you just blocked was intended to ping you, did it work? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 00:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Probably -- I am currently having major problems with some hardware, and about to shut my computer down. ~ ♌︎Kalki ⚓︎ 00:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


Can you please review my suggestion on May 1? (it’s at the bottom) – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 22:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

May 1Edit

Thank you giving my quote '3', very much appreciated, but I was wondering, what exactly do you not like about the quote? – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 02:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)