Hello, Christian M. (2016), and welcome to the English Wikiquote, a free compendium of quotations written collaboratively by people just like you!

To ask for advice or assistance feel free to drop by the Village Pump or ask on my talk page. Happy editing! And again, welcome! Just A Regular New Yorker (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Poe says "Attention!" in this movie.Edit

In the movie Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Poe Dameron says "Attention!" before introducing himself to the First Order. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

September 2018Edit

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikiquote. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox.
Wikiquote exists for the collecting of notable quotations of famous people and famous works. For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote, and also What Wikiquote is not for a list of common activities that Wikiquote does not support.
When people are not interested in responsibly contributing to the development of the project incidents of their deliberate vandalism can result in their usernames or IP addresses being blocked from editing.
Thank you.

For the record, no over-emphasis (such as adding too many of the same letter to the word just because they say it long and loud, all-caps, and too many unnecessary exclamation points), and only two quotes per episode. WikiLubber (talk) 02:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for adding additional quotes that seemed unnecessary. I wasn't trying to vandalize the extended yellings or dialogues from several episodes of SpongeBob SquarePants. Then I didn't realize that there should be only TWO quotes per episode for each season (if I'm right). I will soon look into Wikiquote's sandbox to understand better. Thanks. Christian M. (2016) (talk 02:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 14:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 19:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 17:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

March 2020Edit

Your edits to The Lion King (2019 film) were not constructive. Wikiquote has rules on how many quotes per film. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

This is seemingly the number of quotes of the original Lion King page, but needed to add back at least a few more that seem important, including Nala and Simba's argument, the introduction of Hakuna Matata, and the hyenas turning against Scar for his betrayal. Christian (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC).

Importance is no excuse for copyvio. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
That was different for the 2017 remake of Beauty and the Beast. It also features the importance in the dialogue, as the 1991 film's page only had a few, alongside many character lines. Christian (talk) 03:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC).
Inexcusable. There are no exceptions to the rule. DawgDeputy (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
And did you learn nothing from September 2018? DawgDeputy (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I understand on having at least two sections that seem important for shows like SpongeBob. Christian (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC).
Nevertheless, the limitations on quotes apply to all articles. For films, only five quotes every hour per film. Not a symbol more. This film: 10 quotes is the maximum for a 118-minute film. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Is it? I don't see quite enough in there... Christian (talk) 22:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC).
It is, and 10 is enough. We have to comply with the rules, not with your bias. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Dawg...you're making me angry. I really want to add back several of those unused dialogues that just are important. Christian (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
We do not need them. What we have are enough. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Stop violating protocol. Consult the article's talk page first, or just stop. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020Edit

  Thanks for experimenting with Wikiquote. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikiquote:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will normally be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our compendium of quotations. For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote, and also What Wikiquote is not for a list of common activities that Wikiquote does not support. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Keep it simple. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay. I was only correcting the dialogue within how it sounded in the final cut of The Lion King 1 1/2. Some wording could have been kept. Christian M. (2016) 11:54, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020Edit

  Thanks for experimenting with Wikiquote. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikiquote:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will normally be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our compendium of quotations. For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote, and also What Wikiquote is not for a list of common activities that Wikiquote does not support. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

September 2020Edit

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, add nonsense pages, or pages for nonnotable subjects, you may be blocked from editing Wikiquote. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Why would you think I'm disobedient from correcting grammars in Toy Story 3? Christian M. 20:17 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Adding excessive and unnecessary emphasis is not correcting grammar. It is adding to the problem. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This wouldn't lead you to conclusions that I was disobedient without looking at the full picture! Christian M 12:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
That is exactly what I mean by vandalism. You claim to correct grammar, but instead, you add to the problem. Cease and desist, or face indefinite blocking. DawgDeputy (talk) 16:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020Edit

Dawg. If to ask kindly to stop. making. excuses, I WAS correcting several words in Finding Nemo. Nemo says "Dad", he does not say "Father"; however, Bloat exclaims not just "FIRE" but the whole line, "THE RING OF (FIRE)". Dory also mourns, "Oh, you poor fish", not "Oh, you poor fishes". I am not disobedient, I tell you. It's not what you think as always. Please. Listen to me. I'm only trying to help. Christian M. 13:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Source for proof if you are to accept it. I'm not wanting you to block me indefinitely. https://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Finding-Nemo.html Christian M. 21:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
IMDB and IMSDB are no longer reliable. Users can change them at any time, and sometimes, the lines are wrong. DawgDeputy (talk) 04:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021Edit

Regarding your edits to Star Wars Episode 3, the article is good as it is WITHOUT your crayon edits. Please stop your overemphasis. --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Contact another editor? As if he's the arbiter to seek when he himself is a problem editor when it comes to Star Wars articles! People know how idiotic the two of you have become so you should just move on from Episode 3, jackass! --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Let's get this sorted out. I've never meant to crayon, but if we kept fighting on, it's best that I may leave Wikiquote in order to avoid myself getting blocked. -- (Christian M. (2016)) (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

By the way, to clears things out, Shrek the Third needed rewording as I wasn't the first to vandalize the climatic scene of Toy Story. Secondly, Simba's Pride needs less exclamations or anything. This will be my warning as I can't take it anymore of our past arguments. -- (Christian M. (2016)) (talk) 00:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Eaglestorm's point stands. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021Edit

Eagle's point may stand, but it's a little hard to get used for it. It is fair that we will never take how it was parodied by fans, but written according to a true screenplay for a film. I may never leave here for our sakes, as it's a mistake I've done before. It'd be best to accept how the Wikia is meant to go. -- (Christian M. (2016)) (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

For my draft you have denied, you will know no parody. Not in this moment or the next. Every false and considered "Trajan horse" vandalizing statements will be marred, and I will be your warning to every one of them. So says Myers, you may never accept the lampoons, but will only use original screenplays. -- (Christian M. (2016)) (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

yappyapyap. Sure sockpuppet! --Eaglestorm (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not a sockpuppet. I'm only needing to end the edit war I started! It sickens me. Please. Let the pages be how they are, no lampoons. --Christian M. (2016) (talk) 12:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

In trying to do so, you only added to the problem. Plus, you sound very hypocritical. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
running two accounts is being a sockpuppet and you are denying it! and I just LAUGH at you trying to sound self-righteous with your bold statement. Time for you to consult a shrink. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

It’s the truth for not vandalizing! Why won’t you believe me? --Christian M. (2016) (talk) 23:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Christian M. (2016) (talk) 23:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not hypocritical!! It's not true. It's impossible. Only needing to keep how original admins, particularly of AdamDeanHall, would usually for articles! I DECIDE WHAT'S TRUE! Our fight needs to end if my "non-Trojan horse edits" are kept!!! --Christian M. (2016) 14:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
AdamDeanHall is not an administrator, and you clearly are a hypocrite, mocking professional editors the way you did and such. And hiding vandalism within what appear to be good-faith edits is Trojan Horse vandalism (deception is strictly prohibited here outside of real emergencies). And you do not decide what is true. Administrators do. Wikiquote is not your personal toy to emphasize quotes to show off your own personal perspective that is strictly prohibited. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
To be honest, I am never a hypocrite. I never will be. I can't further continue our edit war unless you can believe me for real. I also understand Wikiquote as a real job, not a toy to play. You may never call me the boy who cried wolf from these past years. "I begin to feel left out." You can finally trust me; however, take your time to thank about it for a while, and reply with an opinion later. Anyone I know would trust me for sure, as they have accepted previous submissions to films like Collision Course, Endgame, etc. Wikiquote has everything it needs from me. Why is it the only person who can't see that is you? --Christian M. (2016) 12:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
My point stands. We will not trust you. You make promises on which you always fail to deliver. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I understand. After all, I have made mistakes from the past years. But I can improve before it's too late. Your point may stand for a while, but I will never fail. When can you realize how much you hurt other user's feelings like mine. I'm beginning to feel left out. Now if you'll excuse me, WikiLubber. (talk) 22:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
And do not ever address me as anything but DawgDeputy. Already, you fail to improve. Besides, a small improvement does not undo a long history of false promises. And you hurt a lot of users' feelings far more with your biased/overblown edits that we are forced to undo. This conversation is over. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Sure thing. These aren't true about me. We can still be allies, even if we didn’t get along. But I will leave you peacefully for a while. We'll think this through entirely and eventually. See ya. {:( --Christian M. (2016) 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I do not ally with vandals. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
And nice try calling him as another editor, so pathetic.--Eaglestorm (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I always thought Dawg was formerly known as "WikiLubber" before the rename. Also, you may disagree on my statement, but I can't vandalize anymore for an ally like you.--Christian M. 2016 - 02:37 18 February 2021 (UTC)
We were never allies. DawgDeputy (talk) 12:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
If it never went well today, then I'm leaving you from this for a break. For my own sake. Not just mine, but also, yours. I've never meant to be another editor otherwise. --Christian M. (2016) 1:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This is my last warning. No negative feedbacks on me, as I'm only wanting to keep what I want for pages to be happy! The bell was never from Felicia in TGMD. Please. Let it live in peace. --Christian M. (2016) 2:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Report this vandal: BLOCK HIM if you may, or warn it. Now! --Christian M. (2016) 12:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Finally. At last, relieved. Now you see it was Ratigan's bell, not Felicia's. Also, if you listened carefully in The Enchanted Christmas, Forte screamed "What?! Noooooo!" before he crashed to the ground. For a minor edit, Shere's Khan sentense "how long did you really think you'd survive against me" was italic as it went along with the page of The Jungle Book. --Christian M. (2016) 2:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

your post on User talk:Saroj UpretyEdit

Hi Christian M. (2016) I saw your post was removed from User talk:Saroj Uprety. I am not sure why you posted it there in the first place since Saroj Uprety is not an admin on WQ. You can see the list of admins at Wikiquote:Administrators#List_of_administrators. Good luckOttawahitech (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ottawahitech, never mind him he just makes his keystrokes on anybody he wants to pressgang to his cause even when they're not in any administrative capacity. Refer to his efforts trying to recruit AdamDeanHall for some ideas. --Eaglestorm (talk) 04:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

My RequestEdit

Since when have you believed I was a liar? I have never became one as I've contributed in early 2017 --Christian M. (2016) 22:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

1. You claim this is a request, but this is more like demanding.
2. You once claimed to be leaving, but you never did. You continued on your disruptive editing paths. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021Edit

In case if you were wondering the meaning of "Ifrit Jafar", look here: [1]. Jafar wouldn't be close to a genie, as he was more like a demon in the red coating, and this I found the word "Ifrit" from an Aladdin novelization that combines all three films, the Hercules crossover, and TV series episodes into one. If you say I vandalized, then you may be right. How I see is that it's got corrected and suitable words compared to the messed-up sentences and typos I've done for Disney's last words. If the edit would've been kept, we wouldn't fight over it anymore. It's the only way to fix it all, and end what I've started. --Christian M. (2016) 03:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The only way to fix it and keep it off the record is by not doing it in the first place. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
This time, I understand how you want to keep the page as it is. I also never mean to act as a drama queen on my user page. I had acted like seriously, although I've decided to be and edit more faithfully compared to my reverts from the last weeks, and do you see how they corrected these typos that are left for an unnecessary reason? If you say I'm annoying, then I've never mean to act like so. And, your decision, you can block me if you want by saying I was a problem, and it won't matter for us anymore. Otherwise, I prefer to not be blocked indefinitely, as I'm still learning to do the best job possible for the site. --Christian M. (2016) 20:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The way I see it, you did mean to act like a drama queen, and unfortunately, persistent, problematic editors/vandals such as you do not get second chances, especially if they lie about leaving Wikiquote (like you did repeatedly). And we will not allow you to spread a message to users with the same M.O. as you. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Try defending yourself on ANI instead of crywhining the way you do now. What an embarrassment!--Eaglestorm (talk) 02:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@DawgDeputy @Eaglestorm: I cannot see anything that Christian M posted on an. The thread Wikiquote:Administrators'_noticeboard#Christian_M._(2016)... is populated by posts from you two and User:Koavf, I think? Ottawahitech (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, he's not there, but like I said, going there to explain his drama would be a better course of action than trying to spam those editors. --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I am sorry if you don't agree, but I had to object in order to revert Disney's last words as it was. This was the only way to prevent it from vandals extending the page or so, and it's not a lie about myself returning for the site --Christian M. (2016) 19:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
That could have easily been taken care of by me or Eaglestorm. Your unwarranted presence was completely unnecessary. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Stuff that apology up your kiester. Man up, go to the above thread, and explain yourself, and better yet grow some balls by affirming your previous pledge to not edit anymore. Otherwise, you're nothing more than a liar who refuses to grow up and as this shows [2], you really didn't. If the WP tenet of right to vanish has a WQ version, please exercise that. --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

What you feel doesn't matter anymore, and you should just go away. Your lies have gone on long enough. --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021Edit

So trimming quotes when an article is already at stated limit is now your thing? You're completely off you rockers this time. And that April Fool's stunt you pulled using a "father" is one piece of work, you almost had us believing, but its nothing more than meatpuppetry. Once a liar, still a liar. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021Edit

Please stop trying to add your nonsense edits to articles that are already as good as they are. You're no longer effective and you crow about ending the edit wars you started? You should just end it by moving on and honoring your pledge not to edit anymore. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm wanting to contribute for the better. And you, you or Dawg had lied to me. You said you wouldn't talk to me ever again from a few months, but yet you did. And like an "idiot", I believed you. But I don't further on. You're wrong for me to leave. It's everything you say about me "bloating" or "vandalizing". But I'm capable of so much more --Christian M. (2016) 2:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
No YOU ARE THE LIAR when you said you will not edit anymore but you kept at it. Good one with the fantasy story - provide us with the very diff of either him or I saying that specifically, because you're pursuing another witchhunt. "I'm capable of so much more" - nice try puffing your chest wherever you are. Yes, you are capable of so much more - I hate to say it - deceptive practices. So don't ever try to gaslight people around here and present yourself as the victim. We're doing better here without you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
It’s not about me being a victim, or gaslighting anyone. It’s all about what you believe. And I believe that leaving the site was for a break, and was never meant to be completely abandoned. I love and appreciate contributing in great efforts, as others do as well, and appreciate everyone's efforts. --Christian M. (2016) 3:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
LOL is that you, or your "father" talking? trying to justify leaving whether for some time, is still leaving. and you still came back. You've long proven DawgDeputy's claims of mendacity by your actions. You do not want to test me. --Eaglestorm (talk) 04:26, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

You think your latest edits offensive works? It's all unnecessary. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR GD HEAD, YOU IDIOT! --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Your latest attempt at deflection doesn't work. Don't try to attribute your own failures and incompetence to me, kid. You're simply ineffective as the reverts of your unnecessary edits shows. JUST STOP! --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Eaglestorm, attacking other users, even vandals, is not a good idea. You need to stop, or the case against him might get damaged. DawgDeputy (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021Edit

Your attempts to justify your fantasist edits by citing youtube clips do nothing to help your cause, especially in one article you've become a walking problem on. YOU CAN'T BE TRUSTED ANYMORE SO GET LOST! --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

What's that latest idiot summary you just made? You think that scares people? Especially when it's an admin who did it and is firm with what he put in when you dilly-dally with your stupidity? Hey Myers, your nonsense ends. You be true to your earlier pledge to leave, because you're simply a liar who can't be trusted here. By gosh, you can't even let that go and you think not editing for days works? How pathetic you've become. --Eaglestorm (talk) 10:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021Edit

FACE IT, DAWG AND EAGLE. I'm going hypocritical against these edit warring, among needing to kick out these new vandals. I worry that I may get attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (potentially that doesn't mean I will), so if it only leave pages as is, then all is good, ok. --Christian M. (2016) 13:42, 7 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Stop lying. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Oh and what should we face? You think all these bold italic wording and being absent from editing for several days at a time makes you think you get back with a vengeance. You still haven't pushed through on your promise to leave the site months ago, and even that father stunt you pulled brings tears to a glass eye. Stop being the desperate liar you've consistently shown to be. You plead in one of your edits that I have to listen? Sorry man, I don't listen to fools who can't even fathom themselves why they get so much heat for their edits without using mental illness as a crutch. --Eaglestorm (talk) 23:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)