Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, and use headings for better formatting. You can do that automatically by simply pressing the plus sign (+) on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thank you!

Naxalite editEdit

Hello, why did you revert my edit to the naxalite wikiquote page? They are a terrorist organisation - as it says on the wikipedia page. And the global security external link is a good source. Let me know your thoughts. --2001:8003:4085:8100:9410:C762:E058:B084 05:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, I've read the page. The words 'terrorist' automatically hit me as a red flag/NPOV at first. dibbydib (T · C) 05:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Timeline of the Naxalite–Maoist insurgency is a good wikipedia page that elaborates a bit more on their numerous attacks. --2001:8003:4085:8100:9410:C762:E058:B084 05:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your comments on Administrators' noticeboardEdit

I said it on Koavf's talk but I realized, I should say this here. User:Dibbydib You have already said the same things multiple times on WQ:AN. It will be helpful for everyone, if you now stop repeating yourself and let administrators handle the case on its merits. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 10:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

  • This was a content dispute, if was you who advised the other user on my talk page to take this to Village pump. I posted there, and a Butwhatdoiknow asked to move to WQ:AN. Then you accuse me of crying wolf. <clapping hands>
  • Holy Mother of Jesus, now you have repeated your accusations about Wikipedia for a " Seventh time " in a row on this page here. You have hijacked all my threads and spamming each one with drama. What is wrong with you ? Why is it so hard for you to grasp a simple point that matter about other Wikis are not discussed here. If you are not a part of this "we group" of harassers, then you should stop acting as a part of one. You have proved yourself utterly biased and appallingly hostile against me right from the time when you first posted on my talk page. If you have any doubt, you should consult a neutral user to give you some feedback on this false delusion of yours that "you have tried to be neutral" here.
  • I have no content disputes with you and I have no intentions to escalate this issue with you. But there is a limit for everything. Seven times is a lot. You are not a party to this thread on WQ:AN yet, but looking at your campaign of harassment against me, you are forcing me to make you one.
  • I am saying this one last time on your user talk so that you heed to my message, if you continue repeating this in this campaign for harassing me, then I will be forced to call out this repeated harassment from you on WQ:AN asking the admins to do something about your crusade against me. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
@Pratap Pandit: maybe don't go after me just because I discovered that you're a single-purpose account from your contributions, and I am highly skeptical of you as a natural extension of that. I first asked you and დამოკიდებულება to settle things out in the VP. I didn't even start the AN thread, and I usually try to distance myself from dramas like these (and I don't want to get too involved in this one), but I felt like not enough coverage was given.
I'm not trying to paint you as some evil POV vandal, if you don't want to get involved, try and settle disputes in an orderly manner instead of going after everyone who doesn't agree with you.
Accusations like these aren't cool at all, and remember, there is no cabal 8) dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 23:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
It seems you either have not read point number 3 by GMG here or are just too incompetent to understand what it means. Please discuss with GMG if you have trouble understanding what his Point #3 means. Clearly, you are the one who is harassing and going after me spamming all my threads and yet you claim that I am going after you ? The repetition above of WP makes this an eighth strike of personal attacks. If you think that repeating yourself seven times on an Administrators' noticeboard seen by all the admins did not give you enough coverage, then you must have guessed by now, that nothing else will. You have already got all the coverage there is to get but you fail to comprehend that everyone else is simply ignoring you, as you are unable to understand point#3 by GMG. Finally, these are personal attacks on me, and I am not ignoring them. As I said, I will take actions to shut down this harassment emanating from you, if you dont shut it down yourself after this request here. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 08:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Dude. I've literally read and replied to the AN thread several hours ago. For the last time, I don't want threats against me, and I don't like to get too involved in dramas.
Focus on the actual information regarding the dispute itself. Trying to look intimidating and threatening me is never okay, so I'd advise you'd stray away from that.
Sometimes I do get a bit overboard (which is why I tend to settle away from disputes and dramas), and I'll admit that here, but there's no reason to call harassment on my talk page. This only exacerbates problems.
If you want to help, help us come to a consensus about the content on the AN thread and don't reply to this message. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 08:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
If you have already read the AN thread as you say, then clearly the only explanation for your action is that you have trouble in understanding what that line means. Copying the lines by GMG here in bold text.
#3. Please do not import disputes from other projects. Please limit discussion to any disruption you feel has happened here.
Tell me which part of this simple English sentence is hard for you to comprehend ?
Your talk page is the first place to call out your harassment asking you to drop it. If you ignore the request, then the next step as per our policies is to move to Administrator's noticeboard and seek admin interventions as you can't be bothered to understand or follow a simple English sentence. What you have said on this talk page will also be considered by the admin's when this matter is taken to WQ:AN. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 08:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I've already said everything in the reply I just gave you - I understand everything GreenMeansGo said and am currently trying to come to a consensus on AN. To reiterate, if you want to help, help us come to a consensus about the content on the AN thread and don't reply to this message. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 08:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
  1. To be clear, the purpose of starting this thread is to make you realize that it is not cool to repeatedly (8 times so far) chant matters about Wikipedia edits. The request for you is to stop doing that.
  2. You are not a party to this dispute neither you are an admin, your participation so far on WQ:AN threads, has been primarily to harass me, and divert and derail from the topic of the discussion thread. If I were in your place, I would have "unwatched", disengaged from that page and let more competent people or admins (e.g. GMG) handle this, instead of getting all worked up and becoming a party to the problem.
  3. It is time for you to read the Administrators' noticeboard # Instructions which says Content disputes are not discussed on WQ:AN. And that is not the place for building consensus about the content. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 09:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't want to be involved in this. Don't ask me. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 23:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Dont ask you for what ?  I never asked you to be involved in anything. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 18:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You did not answer my question, and I see that you are again (for the ninth time involving yourself in the AN thread and spreading falsehoods against me without any evidence. What is wrong with you ? --Pratap Pandit (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

┌────────────────────┘
I'm trying to settle this conflict by discussing POVs, if you disagree with it please explain. I took a break from this discussion for about 20 days because of the hostility from the dispute. I'm not going against you nor have a POV on the subject the dispute is on - every assessment of POV is based on what I've seen from what was edited. I'm making a table of editors involved on the thread, including POVs as per my opinion. I'm trying to get this dispute settled, if you want to really help then we'll come to a consensus on the thread. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 23:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

this and this makes it a total of Eleven times, that you have tried bringing in Wikipedia stuff on Wikiquote to attack me. Something clearly needs to be done now.--Pratap Pandit (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
I wasn't talking about the enwiki matter, I'm talking about how you're trying to make it look like I've ignored admin requests (which you're doing right now), one of which happened to include talking about the enwiki block which I've completely complied, agreed, and even replied to. I haven't dabbled in the matter since early May, ever since you told me not to. Every time you reply to my talk page, a little NPOV inside me dies...
You got this on yourself, and you are responsible for its continued escalation - don't deny it. I've wanted to sort stuff out but I don't think you're gonna change, and in that case, I'm hands-down not tolerant of the stuff you were doing. The best thing you can do is admit what you did wrong (as I have) and come to a conclusion. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 11:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
I have done no wrong and I am not going to submit to this blatant bullying by you and your coterie. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

RfA adviceEdit

I see that you tried to censor my comments on a Village pump. Understand that you are not allowed to do that. Kindly do not remove my comments again. This further shows your poor judgement skills and how inappropriate you are for a job as a responsible admin. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 08:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I knew you would likely respond poorly to this revert aghghg do I have to write another paragraph (#`-_ゝ-)
You were derailing the conversation in order to try and justify yourself in the AN argument. It's unnecessary and I viewed it in my revert as an attack. Again, I've said what I've said in the AN thread. I will be taking another break from this dispute as it's getting too toxic again, and I'm trying to distance myself from it to work on other things.
Or, should I use your own words: "hijacking each thread and spamming it with drama" :P
Also, some clarifications, I'm not solely against you. I'm against your action pretending like I ignored GMG's comment in edits when I clearly didn't (blah blah blah it's on AN) - I have nothing against you as an editor, even if you have something against me. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 08:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Please do not tweak my comments ever again. as you did on Village Pump. If you want to play around with CSS, do it in your sandbox or your own talk page. I have copied it below for you. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Don't remove that either. I'm not "playing around" with CSS, I'm notifying users that the discussion was off-topic at the time (and believe me, it very much was). "Tweaking my comments" is not the same as "putting them in a fancy box and adding two notes" so you might wanna hold off on making yourself look on-topic dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 11:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
My comments are not off-topic. If you believe it was off topic, you can share your opinion, as a comment here saying you believe it is off topic. You are not allowed to remove or close threads discussing "your" actions on a community page, like village pump. You do not have any authority to stifle or corrupt my comments. An admin will do it if it is needed. If you repeat corrupting my comments, you will be reported for edit warring and violation of talk page guidelines where you are tweaking my comment.
You asked for feedback on your impending RfA and you got your feedback. If you dont have a stomach to digest honest feedback, why are you even asking for it. On top of that you call a honest feedback on some of your recent actions as an "Attack" and then go on to remove the feedback. When I restored my comment you then tried to stifle by corrupting my comment using CSS and tags added in between my comment. I reverted your corruption of my comments. As if that was not enough you then asked your coterie ( User:დამოკიდებულება) to join in and edit war to corrupt my comment once again. These are further examples of your poor judgement and lack of even a basic understanding of Talk page guidelines, that ask editors not to tweak or corrupt another editor's comment.--Pratap Pandit (talk) 12:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
@Pratap Pandit: Top comment was an exact copy-paste of a previous discussion on VP which I explained there. Don't go after me through my talk page, please. If you've gotta reply, Pratap, reply on the VP or AN threads and don't go to my talk page. I'll respond if I need to.
Here's a heads-up though; anything like the copy-pasted comment above is not okay in my books, and the next time I see it on my talk page, I'll either say that I've already responded to it, or I'll simply revert the edit as a duplicate (with link to discussion in edit summary), no edit warring or toxicity intended. I do not want you to go after me, so please don't. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 12:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Copied from WQ:VPEdit

I've labelled this as off-topic to the main discussion, however you can still check it out and discussion is still open, though I'm not going to reply any more on the matter due to toxicity and/or attacks. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 09:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Dibbydib cannot understand a basic fact that matter on Wikipedia are not discussed on other projects. Despite comment by 2 different admins Dibbydib repeats matter about Wikipedia not once but Eleven times. (see link for diffs). This is a classic case of Unable to get a point. Such a clueless user becoming an admin will be an absolute disaster to Wikiquote which is already in a very bad shape. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 10:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

This comment is premature. Three is no pending RfA. Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Read above, he says that the RfA is not-too-far in future. Hence the advice on the impending RfA. In addition to what I noted above, I also see a major problem in his assessment of NPOV. An Editor spams WQ article with far right POV, when the spamming is challenged, Dibbydib concludes that the editor challenging the user adding far right POV is having an Islamic POV. If such people become admin then the chaos that will ensue is unimaginable. WQ users should watchout and be careful. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
I see that Dibbydib has repeatedly tried to censor my comments on this page, Village pump. He must understand that Dibbydib is not allowed to do that. This further shows your poor judgement skills and how inappropriate Dibbydib is for a job of a responsible admin.--Pratap Pandit (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Note: Copied from my talk page (yes, Pratap took it to my talk page)
You were derailing the conversation in order to try and justify yourself in the AN argument. It's unnecessary and I viewed it in my revert as an attack. Again, I've said what I've said in the AN thread. I will be taking another break from this dispute as it's getting too toxic again, and I'm trying to distance myself from it to work on other things.
Or, should I use your own words: "hijacking each thread and spamming it with drama" :P
Also, some clarifications, I'm not solely against you. I'm against your action pretending like I ignored GMG's comment in edits when I clearly didn't blah blah blah it's on AN - I have nothing against you as an editor, even if you have something against me.
This isn't "advice", it's you trying to win a pointless argument in a month-long dispute that I'm taking a break from. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 08:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)