Ksshd
Quotes should never be removed without a comment in the edit summary, and should almost always be moved to the Talk page with a note that they were removed from the article, giving full reasoning. If it is a misattribution, the quote should not be removed, instead being moved to a "Misattributed" section, where explanation of the misattribution can be made in a subbullet. Thanks. ~ DanielTom (talk) 06:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The character of your recent edits to Terence McKenna page and remarks about them indicate that this account is apparently another iteration of attempts made under other names such as "Antichristos"/Attractor321 (talk · contributions) to promote your extremely bizarre personal notions. I have not earnestly noted or researched many of your activities, here and elsewhere, but believe that I had incidentally observed some of your crosswiki campaigns to promote your bizarre ideas even prior to the permanent block placed on your account as User:Antichristos at Wikipedia on 16 March 2015 for "Abusing multiple accounts: prolific socking via IPs to evade block". I am placing this note here, with links to w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antichristos & w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antichristos/Archive for future reference, because despite the occasional addition of some valid quotes, quite often in non-standard formatting, MOST of the observable activity of these accounts, here and elsewhere seems to have been primarily to insert various references to your own personal notions of the universe and your place in it, many of which I believe no lucid person could actually embrace. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 12:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikiquote for abuse of editing privileges. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
proposal for explicitly banning Antichristos/Attractor321/Ksshd at Wikiquote edit
- I have just blocked this account for one week, because I do not actually expect to have much time to deal extensively with your repetitious nonsense at this time. I have noted that another administrator has already permanently blocked the account Attractor321 (talk · contributions) here, which by the peculiarly bizarre content of the edits I have assumed to be another of yours. I am not entirely sure of the technical propriety of that, but after repeated noting of the apparent extent of your obsessive intransigence and fanatical insistence on promoting bizarre notions on various pages, here and elsewhere, I am considering posting this statement to the village pump, within the next week or so, but post it here first so you can have the opportunity to offer some direct comment upon it, even while blocked:
A particular user who has operated under many names in the Wikimedia projects and who was permanently banned at Wikipedia (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antichristos/Archive) for abusing multiple accounts has remained occasionally active here and other wikis, often in a generally inconsiderate, obsessive and disruptive effort to promote some extremely bizarre personal beliefs. I have permanently blocked plenty of obvious vandals and spam accounts, but I believe that I have never proposed that an editor be permanently banned before, but I believe in this case it would probably be appropriate to follow the lead of Wikipedia.
Ksshd seems to be one more iteration this user who was banned at Wikipedia for persistently promoting what might be termed his "Big-Sucker" theories of the Cosmos which seem to implicitly involve extremely narcissistic and solipsist notions of all reality revolving entirely around himself and only himself. The generally asinine quality of his attitudes and actions are quite evident in his presumptuous comments after 2 editors reverted his recent alterations to the Terence McKenna pages. Told by one that, "you have been warned time and time again not to make these changes against consensus - this has been going on for years now" he replied "The opinion of a single high-quality editor like me is more worthy than the opinions of a myriad of low-quality editors like you". Other pages have been afflicted with his edits, and I noticed that in March Ninguable permanently blocked the account Attractor321 (talk · contributions), after I had temporarily blocked it on previous occasions, and posted notice of his likely identity as the Wikipedia banned account User:Antichristos.
Many of the absurd farces of this particular editor have indeed been going on for years now, and will probably continue, under further guises, but it is probably appropriate to join with Wikipedia in declaring this individual permanently banned from editing here, and any edits to pages posting the peculiarly bizarre notions and content which characterize his edits immediately suspect, and subject to immediate reversion by anyone. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 01:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC) + tweaks