Open main menu

John Allen Paulos

American mathematician
John Allen Paulos TAM13.jpg

John Allen Paulos (born July 4, 1945) is an American professor of mathematics at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He is a prominent figure as a writer and speaker on mathematics and the importance of mathematical literacy. Paulos writes about many subjects, especially of the dangers of mathematical innumeracy; that is, the layperson's misconceptions about numbers, probability, and logic.

SourcedEdit

Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988)Edit

All page numbers from the 1990 trade paperback edition published by Vintage Books ISBN 0-679-72601-2
  • Innumerate people characteristically have a strong tendency to personalize—to be misled by their own experiences, or by the media’s focus on individuals and drama.
    • Introduction (p. 6)
  • A tendency to drastically underestimate the frequency of coincidences is a prime characteristic of innumerates, who generally accord great significance to correspondences of all sorts while attributing too little significance to quite conclusive but less flashy statistical evidence.
    • Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (p. 35)
  • The moral, again, is that some unlikely event is likely to occur, whereas it’s much less likely that a particular one will...The paradoxical conclusion is that it would be very unlikely for unlikely events not to occur. If you don’t specify a predicted event precisely, there are an indeterminate number of ways for an event of that general kind to take place.
    • Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (pp. 37-38; ellipsis represents elision of examples)
  • There’s always enough random success to justify almost anything to someone who wants to believe.
    • Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (p. 44)
  • There surely is something to these terms, but too often they’re the result of minds intent on discovering meaning where there is only probability.
    • Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (p. 62)
  • To follow foolish precedents, and wink with both eyes, is easier than to think.
  • Any bit of nonsense can be computerized—astrology, biorhythms, the I Ching—but that doesn’t make the nonsense any more valid.
    • Chapter 3, “Pseudoscience” (p. 68)
  • Disproving a claim that something exists is often quite difficult, and this difficulty is often mistaken for evidence that the claim is true...Presented as I am periodically with these and other fantastical claims, I sometimes feel a little like a formally dressed teetotaler at a drunken orgy for reiterating that not being able to conclusively refute the claims does not constitute evidence for them.
    • Chapter 3, “Pseudoscience” (pp. 95-96; ellipsis represents elision of new age examples)
  • I remember thinking of mathematics as a kind of omnipotent protector. You could prove things to people and they would have to believe you whether they liked you or not.
    • Chapter 4, “Whence Innumeracy?” (p. 99)
  • Bad things happen periodically, and they’re going to happen to somebody. Why not you?
    • Chapter 4, “Whence Innumeracy?” (p. 110)
  • Too often, this concern for the big picture is simply obscurantist and is put forward by people who prefer vagueness and mystery to (partial) answers. Vagueness is at times necessary and mystery is never in short supply, but I don’t think they’re anything to worship. Genuine science and mathematical precision are more intriguing than are the “facts” published in supermarket tabloids or a romantic innumeracy which fosters credulity, stunts skepticism, and dulls one to real imponderables.
    • Chapter 4, “Whence Innumeracy?” (pp. 126-127)
  • There is no such thing as free lunch, and even if there were, there’d be no guarantee against indigestion.
    • Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 147)
  • Correlation and causation are two quite different words, and the innumerate are more prone to mistake them than most.
    • Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 159)
  • If we’re not keenly aware of the choices we’re making, we’re not likely to work for better ones.
    • Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 176)

Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)Edit

All page numbers from the first trade paperback edition published in 2009 by Hill and Wang ISBN 978-0-8090-5918-8
  • Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
  • Define God in a sufficiently nebulous way as beauty, love, mysterious complexity, or the ethereal taste of strawberry shortcake, and most atheists become theists. Still, although one can pose as Humpty Dumpty and aver, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less,” others needn’t play along.
  • For the record, natural selection is a highly nonrandom process that acts on the genetic variation produced by random mutation and genetic drift and results in those organisms with more adaptive traits differentially surviving and reproducing.
    • Part 1 “Four Classical Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Design (and Some Creationist Calculations)” (p. 19)
  • You would think that the obvious irreligious objection would come to almost anyone’s mind when reading a religious tome or holy book. What if you don’t believe the holy book’s presuppositions and narrative claims and simply ask for independent argument or evidence for God’s existence? What if you’re not persuaded by the argument that God exists because His assertion that He exists and discussion of His various exploits appear in this book about Him that believers say He inspired?
    • Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Prophecy (and the Bible Codes)” (p. 63)
  • Claiming that a holy book’s claims are undeniable because the book itself claims them to be is convincing only to the convinced.
    • Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Prophecy (and the Bible Codes)” (p. 64)
  • Confirmation of a person’s unreliable statement by another unreliable person makes the statement even less reliable.
    • Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Prophecy (and the Bible Codes)” (p. 65)
  • The whole weight of science is the prima facie evidence against a miracle having occurred.
    • Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 5 “The Argument from Interventions (and Miracles, Prayers, and Witnesses)” (p. 88)
  • It’s become somewhat fashionable to say that religion and science are growing together and are no longer incompatible. This convergence is, in my opinion, illusory. In fact, I don’t believe that any attempt to combine these very disparate bodies of ideas can succeed intellectually.
    • Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 5 “The Argument from Interventions (and Miracles, Prayers, and Witnesses)” (pp. 88-89)
  • The universe acts on us, we adapt to it, and the notions that we develop as a result, including the mathematical ones, are in a sense taught us by the universe. Evolution has selected those of our ancestors (both human and not) whose behavior and thought were consistent with the workings of the universe.
    • Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 4 “The Universality Argument (and the Relevance of Morality and Mathematics)” (p. 131)
  • The connections among morality, prudence, and religion are complicated and beyond my concerns here. I would like to counter, however, the claim regularly made by religious people that atheists and agnostics are somehow less moral or law-abiding than they. There is absolutely no evidence for this, and I suspect whatever average distance there is along the nebulous dimension of morality has the opposite algebraic sign.
    • Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 5 “The Gambling Argument (and Emotions from Prudence to Fear)” (p. 139)
  • It’s always healthy to recognize facts.
    • Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 6 “Atheists, Agnostics, and “Brights”” (p. 146)
  • While not a panacea, candidly recognizing the absence of any good logical arguments for God’s existence, giving up on divine allies and advocates as well as taskmasters and tormentors, and prizing a humane, reasonable, and brave outlook just might help move this world a bit closer to a heaven on earth.
    • Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 6 “Atheists, Agnostics, and “Brights”” (p. 149)

External linksEdit

Wikipedia has an article about: