In the sect – fairly large and yet unusually choice – of
Austenians or Janites, there would probably be found partisans of the claim to primacy of almost every one of the novels.
[It] is the unbroken testimony of all
history that alcoholic liquors have been used by the strongest, wisest, handsomest, and in every way best races of all times.
Notes on a Cellar-Book (1920; Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008) p. 32 But dinner is dinner, a meal at which not so much to eat — it becomes difficult to eat much at it as you grow older — as to drink, to talk, to flirt, to discuss, to rejoice "at the closing of the day". I do not think anything serious should be done after it, as nothing should before breakfast.
A Scrap Book (London: Macmillan, 1922) p. 31 Let us also once more
rejoice in, and thank God for, the fact that we know nothing about Homer, and practically nothing about Shakespeare.
A Last Scrap Book (London: Macmillan, 1924) p. 42
The Book of History is the Bible of
George Saintsbury: The Memorial Volume (London: Methuen, 1946) p. 120.
A History of Criticism and Literary Taste in Europe from the Earliest Texts to the Present Day Edit
Quotations are cited from the first US edition (New York: Dodd, Meads, 1900–04).
We shall not busy ourselves with what men ought to have admired, what they ought to have written, what they ought to have thought, but with what they did think, write, admire.
Oratory is, after all, the prose literature of the savage.
Criticism is the endeavour to find, to know, to love, to recommend, not only the best, but all the good, that has been known and thought and written in the world.
I wish that I could save myself constant repetition by printing across the dog's-ear place of these pages the warning,
"Never judge a critic by your agreement with his likes and dislikes.”
So, then, there abide these three, Aristotle, Longinus, and Coleridge.
A Last Vintage Edit
Quotations are cited from John W. Oliver et al. (eds.) A Last Vintage (London: Methuen, 1950).
Historians may lie, but
Nothing is more curious than the almost savage hostility that
Humour excites in those who lack it.
Majorities are generally wrong, if only in their reasons for being right.
When people cannot write good
literature it is perhaps natural that they should lay down rules how good literature should be written. External links Edit