File:The Use of Land Power to Counter the Iranian Nuclear Proliferation Challenge (2007).pdf

Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 548 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 121 pages)

This file is from Wikimedia Commons and may be used by other projects. The description on its file description page there is shown below.


English: Use of land power to counter the Iranian nuclear proliferation challenge (2007): The United States and Iran have been in conflict since the Iranian Revolution. Iran is seeking to increase its power in the Middle East while America is seeking to maintain its own power in the region while simultaneously containing Iran’s regional ambitions. Though there appear to have been attempts by Iranian moderates to temper Iranian policy towards the US, extremists within Iran’s domestic power structure have successfully blocked any significant openings. Since at least the Iran-Iraq War, Iran has been developing nuclear technology to acquire the nuclear fuel cycle. Because the fuel cycle will allow Iran to construct atomic weapons as well as generate electricity, the US has opposed Iran’s attempt at nuclear proliferation. With the news that Iran has begun enriching uranium and that it seeks to produce plutonium, the US and some European countries have sought to dissuade Iran from completing the nuclear fuel cycle. Since the 9/11 attacks the US has declared a policy to stop emerging threats before they become dangerous. In this context, President Bush has declared that Iran will not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. In order to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, a number of policies are suggested including a diplomatic “Grand Bargain,” building a system of containment and deterrence, and using military power to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. In the case of using military power, air strikes are the most frequent recommendation, and the use of land power is largely ignored. If land power were used to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, there are three major options including an invasion and occupation, a strategic raid to destroy known nuclear facilities, and a special operations raid to destroy a single nuclear facility. Each ground option would rely on significant air and naval power to be successful. The invasion option is feasible with great effort and is the most suitable ground option because it provides a certainty of effect that no other course of action can match. However, the invasion option is not acceptable due to the high costs. The strategic raid option is marginally feasible, but the costs are not acceptable and it lacks significant advantage over the pure air option thus rendering it only marginally suitable. The special operations raid is conditionally an acceptable course of action, but it is neither suitable nor feasible given the lack of intelligence the US has about Iranian nuclear facilities and the limited effect a special operations raid could have on a large industrial target.
Author Bruce W. Terry


Public domain
This file is a work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, it is in the public domain in the United States.

العربية  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  hrvatski  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  lietuvių  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  српски / srpski  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file


File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

current18:16, 20 February 2017Thumbnail for version as of 18:16, 20 February 20171,275 × 1,650, 121 pages (548 KB)Illegitimate BarristerUser created page with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.