Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/Illegitimate Barrister
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.
The result was: Successful application.
The application having received the unanimous support of the community; Illegitimate Barrister is now an administrator. BD2412 T 00:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Illegitimate Barrister (talk · contributions) edit
In light of recent events, I'd like to request adminship to deal with the increasing number of vandals lately (specifically Alabaster and his numerous sockpuppet accounts). As a regular user I can only revert, which does not help much as vandals can still run amok. It is extremely frustrating to see a vandal running loose and not being able to do a single damned thing about it, please excuse my French. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Illegitimate Barrister 04:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate's acceptance: Self nomination
Vote ends: 30 January 2015
*Oppose too new of an account. Alabaster (talk) Striking 'oppose' by blocked editor. Pmlineditor (t · c · l)
- Support. The above vote, is of course that of the vandal running amok lately, and has little significance save to show how infantile a mentality this person has, for anyone to see. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 06:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: well-intentioned & trusted user, who will be of great help especially in fighting vandalism. ~ DanielTom (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Illegitimate Barrister will be a great admin in helping to improve Wikiquote. Miszatomic (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support We need more admins to handle our vandal friend and other spammers. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I believe this user would be a definite asset in the ever increasing battle against incidents of vandalism. Over the past couple of years, I have seen many helpful edits and I believe this would continue. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, good candidate, positive contributor, per UDScott. -- Cirt (talk) 05:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I Support as with all above. DeistCosmos (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per the above. User has high experience. --Abd (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Eurodyne (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. No reasons to oppose. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 19:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks for volunteering to do the extra work. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥ 02:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.